Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Frederick McMILLIAN, Petitioner, v. Donald SELSKY, as Director of Special Housing Unit, New York Department of Correctional Services, et al., Respondents.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.
Petitioner, a prison inmate, was found guilty of lewd exposure in violation of a prison disciplinary rule after a nurse witnessed petitioner masturbating in his cell. Although petitioner pleaded not guilty to the charge, he did admit that he was masturbating at the time of the incident and that the nurse did witness the incident. He, however, contends that his exposure was unintentional and that he was unaware that his cellmate had made a sick call. Contrary to petitioner's contentions, the misbehavior report, authored by the nurse who witnessed the incident, and petitioner's own admissions regarding his actions provide substantial evidence of petitioner's guilt (see, Matter of McNair v. Goord, 265 A.D.2d 716, 697 N.Y.S.2d 183). Petitioner's explanation that the incident was unintentional and he was unaware that the nurse was making her rounds merely raised a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see, Matter of Jaime v. Goord, 262 A.D.2d 823, 692 N.Y.S.2d 756). Petitioner's remaining contentions, including his challenge to the penalty imposed, have been examined and found to be without merit.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: January 27, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)