Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: TOWN OF CARMEL, petitioner-respondent, v. Wayne A. BLANKS, a/k/a Wayne A. Ryder, etc., et al., appellants, et al., respondents.
In a condemnation proceeding, Wayne A. Blanks, a/k/a Wayne A. Ryder, and Dean L. Ryder, individually and as executors of the Estate of Merrit L. Ryder, appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Putnam County (Palella, J.), dated December 1, 1998, which granted the petition and authorized the petitioner to file acquisition maps causing easements on certain real property to vest in it.
ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed.
The petitioner, condemnor in this condemnation proceeding, published notice of the public hearing in three consecutive issues of a weekly newspaper. A condemnor is permitted to publish notice in a weekly newspaper only if there is no daily newspaper within the locality (see, EDPL 202[A], [B] ). The petitioner does not contest the appellants' assertion that there was a daily newspaper in the locality. Therefore, the petitioner was required to publish notice of the public hearing “in at least five successive issues” of the daily newspaper in the locality (see, EDPL 202[A] ). The failure to adhere to the publication requirements of EDPL 202(A) renders the proceeding jurisdictionally defective and warrants dismissal of the proceeding (see, Matter of New Life Fellowship v. City of Cortland, 175 A.D.2d 343, 572 N.Y.S.2d 421).
Additionally, the petition was made returnable only 12 days after the petition was filed. EDPL 402(B)(2) requires that the petition be made returnable 20 days after the filing of the petition. Therefore, the petitioner failed to satisfy the notice requirement under EDPL 402(B)(2), which also requires dismissal of the petition.
The appellants' remaining contentions are without merit.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 14, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)