Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Norberto PEETS, Petitioner, v. Norman BEZIO, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with fighting, creating a disturbance and disobeying a direct order. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty and a penalty was imposed. That decision was affirmed upon petitioner's administrative appeal, prompting him to commence this proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to challenge the determination of guilt.
We confirm. The detailed misbehavior report, together with the testimony of the correction officer who wrote the report, provide substantial evidence of petitioner's guilt (see Matter of Williams v. Walsh, 56 A.D.3d 923, 923, 866 N.Y.S.2d 576 [2008]; Matter of Ponder v. Fischer, 54 A.D.3d 1094, 1095, 864 N.Y.S.2d 572 [2008] ). To the extent that petitioner argues that he was denied the testimony of a particular correction officer, the record reveals that such testimony was properly precluded (see Matter of Sutherland v. Selsky, 56 A.D.3d 833, 834, 867 N.Y.S.2d 557 [2008]; Matter of Morris v. Goord, 50 A.D.3d 1327, 1327, 855 N.Y.S.2d 307 [2008] ). Petitioner's procedural claims, including his assertions that the Hearing Officer was biased, was improperly designated and failed to provide him with access to a translator and/or an alleged videotape of the incident, are unpreserved for our review (see Matter of Johnson v. Department of Correctional Servs., 53 A.D.3d 746, 747, 862 N.Y.S.2d 618 [2008]; Matter of Striplin v. Selsky, 28 A.D.3d 969, 969, 812 N.Y.S.2d 722 [2006] ).
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 19, 2009
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)