Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Cathy PALMERI, et al., respondents, v. BRIARWOOD AT ALLEY POND CONDOMINIUM, et al., appellants (and a third-party action).
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Aphrodite Daniels, a/k/a Aphrodite Angelidis and the defendants Briarwood at Alley Pond Condominium and Board of Managers of Briarwood at Alley Pond Condominium separately appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Price, J.), dated March 24, 1998, which denied their respective motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs.
The record establishes that as the plaintiff Cathy Palmeri (hereinafter the plaintiff) was descending an external stairway of premises owned by the defendant Aphrodite Daniels, a/k/a Aphrodite Angelidis (hereinafter Daniels) and leased by the third-party defendants Bryanne and Mark Spinner, she slipped on a discarded coffee table leg and fell. Following a reconstruction of the stairway by Daniels nearly two years earlier, the bannister or railing on the level where the plaintiff slipped had been removed and never replaced. The stairway itself was part of the common elements of a community known as Briarwood at Alley Pond Condominium (hereinafter the condominium).
Daniels' motion for summary judgment was properly denied. The plaintiffs established that questions of fact exist regarding whether Daniels' failure to install a railing on the reconstructed stairway, as well as her placement of table legs for discarding in or around the stairwell, constituted a breach of her duty to maintain the premises in a reasonably safe condition (see, e.g., Basso v. Miller, 40 N.Y.2d 233, 386 N.Y.S.2d 564, 352 N.E.2d 868; Kraemer v. K-Mart Corp., 226 A.D.2d 590, 641 N.Y.S.2d 130). In addition, the condominium's separate motion for summary judgment was also properly denied. There are questions of fact regarding whether the condominium's failure to enforce Administrative Code of the City of New York § 27-376 was a proximate cause of the plaintiff's injuries (see, e.g., Orlick v. Granit Hotel & Country Club, 30 N.Y.2d 246, 331 N.Y.S.2d 651, 282 N.E.2d 610; Hotzoglou v. Hotzoglou, 221 A.D.2d 594, 634 N.Y.S.2d 501; Lattimore v. Falcone, 35 A.D.2d 1069, 316 N.Y.S.2d 363).
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: August 02, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)