Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Robert S. GAIMAN, a Suspended Attorney and Counselor-at-Law. Committee on Professional Standards, Petitioner; Robert S. Gaiman, Respondent.
Respondent was admitted to practice by this court in 1979 and maintained an office for the practice of law in Monticello, Sullivan County.
In April 1999, respondent pleaded guilty in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York to the Federal felony of aiding in the filing of a false tax return (26 USC § 7206[2] ). He then consented to his suspension from practice, based on his conviction of a serious crime, until such time as this court made a final disciplinary order (262 A.D.2d 706, 691 N.Y.S.2d 593). Respondent has filed an affidavit of compliance with the suspension order, which was made effective June 7, 1999. On July 15, 1999, respondent was sentenced to one year of probation, a $1,000 fine, and a $100 assessment. He has paid the monetary penalties.
Petitioner, the Committee on Professional Standards, now moves for entry of a final disciplinary order. It appears from the papers submitted by respondent in mitigation, including character affidavits from a number of attorneys who know him well and a plea for disciplinary leniency by the sentencing judge, that respondent's crime was an aberrational lapse in judgment in a legal career with an otherwise unblemished disciplinary record. Respondent expresses remorse for his transgression.
Under the particular circumstances presented, we grant petitioner's motion and conclude that respondent should be suspended for a period of three months, nunc pro tunc to June 7, 1999 (see, e.g., Matter of Neroni, 185 A.D.2d 1015, 587 N.Y.S.2d 775, 186 A.D.2d 860, 588 N.Y.S.2d 665). In view of the expiration of said period, respondent is hereby reinstated to practice, without further proceedings in this court (see, e.g., Matter of Chulak, 251 A.D.2d 744, 674 N.Y.S.2d 157).
ORDERED that petitioner's motion is granted; and it is further
ORDERED that respondent is suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months, nunc pro tunc to June 7, 1999; and it is further
ORDERED that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.
PER CURIAM.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: September 08, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)