Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: CITY TUNNEL NO. 3, STAGE 2 (SHAFT 22B) BROOKLYN. Peter Bournakis, et al., appellants; City of New York, respondent.
In a condemnation proceeding, the claimants Peter Bournakis, Julia Bournakis, Fourth Avenue Automobile Service, Ltd., and Universal Metal Machine Works, Inc., appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Scholnick, J.), entered June 16, 1998, as granted the motion of the City of New York to dismiss the consequential fixture claim of Universal Metal Machine Works, Inc., and denied the latter's cross motion for leave to file a late or amended claim.
ORDERED that the appeal by claimants Peter Bournakis, Julia Bournakis, and Fourth Avenue Automobile Service, Ltd., is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as they are not aggrieved by the order appealed from (see, CPLR 5511); and it is further,
ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from by the claimant Universal Metal Machine Works, Inc., with costs.
We agree with the Supreme Court that the consequential fixture claim filed by Universal Metal Machine Works, Inc. (hereinafter Universal), did not constitute an amendment to its direct claim, and therefore was untimely. The court's denial of Universal's motion to file a late or amended claim was proper in light of Universal's failure to provide a reasonable excuse for not seeking to do so earlier (see, Grandinetti v. Metropolitan Transp. Auth., 139 A.D.2d 619, 527 N.Y.S.2d 260, affd. 74 N.Y.2d 785, 545 N.Y.S.2d 94, 543 N.E.2d 737; see also, Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co. v. Bontrager Realty, 191 A.D.2d 1002, 595 N.Y.S.2d 344; Metropolitan Transp. Auth. v. Pizzuti, 156 A.D.2d 546, 549 N.Y.S.2d 52).
Universal's remaining contentions are without merit.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: December 20, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)