Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Adina BENEDIKT, et al., respondents, v. CERTIFIED LUMBER CORPORATION, et al., appellants, et al., defendant.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants Certified Lumber Corporation, Certified Lumber, LLC, and Israel Nieman appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Partnow, J.), dated July 9, 2008, which granted the plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiffs established a prima facie case for summary judgment in their favor on the issue of liability by demonstrating that the defendant driver failed to yield the right of way to the injured plaintiff, Adina Benedikt, who was crossing the street within the crosswalk with the pedestrian “WALK” signal in her favor (see Zabusky v. Cochran, 234 A.D.2d 542, 651 N.Y.S.2d 190; Jermin v. APA Truck Leasing Co., 237 A.D.2d 255, 655 N.Y.S.2d 406). The plaintiffs submitted an affidavit by the injured plaintiff to that effect, which was supported by copies of the police accident reports and the MV-104 report signed by the defendant driver, containing that defendant's admission against interest that he did not see the injured plaintiff before he struck her (see Niyazov v. Bradford, 13 A.D.3d 501, 786 N.Y.S.2d 582; Vaden v. Rose, 4 A.D.3d 468, 771 N.Y.S.2d 670; Kemenyash v. McGoey, 306 A.D.2d 516, 762 N.Y.S.2d 629; Guevara v. Zaharakis, 303 A.D.2d 555, 756 N.Y.S.2d 465). The affidavit of the defendant driver, submitted in opposition to the motion, merely raised feigned issues of fact, which are insufficient to defeat a motion for summary judgment (see Capraro v. Staten Is. Univ. Hosp., 245 A.D.2d 256, 664 N.Y.S.2d 826; Miller v. City of New York, 214 A.D.2d 657, 625 N.Y.S.2d 271; Garvin v. Rosenberg, 204 A.D.2d 388, 614 N.Y.S.2d 190), and the defendants failed to demonstrate that further discovery was warranted (see Lopez v. WS Distrib., Inc., 34 A.D.3d 759, 760, 825 N.Y.S.2d 516).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: March 17, 2009
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)