The People, etc., respondent, v. Jahrel Cade, appellant. (2026)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

The People, etc., respondent, v. Jahrel Cade, appellant.

2023–06508, (Ind.No. 70360 /23)

Decided: June 17, 2026

MARK C. DILLON, J.P. HELEN VOUTSINAS LAURENCE L. LOVE ELENA GOLDBERG VELAZQUEZ, JJ.

Patricia Pazner, New York, N.Y. (Anna Jouravleva of counsel; Natalie Gonzalez on the brief), for appellant. Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Julian Joiris of counsel), for respondent.

Argued—June 1, 2026

DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Raymond L. Rodriguez, J.), rendered July 21, 2023, convicting him of attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the record demonstrates that he knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see People v. Thomas, 34 NY3d 545, 567; People v. Brown, 245 AD3d 955, 955; People v. Colonna, 239 AD3d 671, 671). The defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes appellate review of his challenge to the Supreme Court's suppression determination (see People v. Berrios, _ AD3d _, _, 2026 N.Y. Slip Op 02664, *1; People v. Fields, _ AD3d _, _, 2026 N.Y. Slip Op 01981, *1; People v. Williams, 235 AD3d 784, 784).

DILLON, J.P., VOUTSINAS, LOVE and GOLDBERG VELAZQUEZ, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Darrell M. Joseph

Clerk of the Court

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network