Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Aaron CALLENDER, Petitioner, v. Donald SELSKY, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Based upon information received from the victim, who was slashed with a razor blade, petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules prohibiting assaults on inmates and fighting. Following an unsuccessful administrative appeal, this CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.
To the extent that petitioner raises an issue of substantial evidence, the misbehavior report and victim's testimony identifying petitioner as the perpetrator provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see Matter of Williams v. Goord, 259 A.D.2d 793, 794, 687 N.Y.S.2d 190 [1999] ). There is no merit to petitioner's challenge regarding the confidential information leading to the charges inasmuch as the identity of the confidential informant was revealed and he testified at the hearing. Furthermore, petitioner's assertion that he was locked in his cell at the time of the assault created a credibility issue, which the Hearing Officer was free to resolve against petitioner (see Matter of Walton v. Goord, 290 A.D.2d 764, 736 N.Y.S.2d 502 [2002] ).
Petitioner's remaining contentions, including his assertion that he was improperly removed from the hearing, have been considered and found to be either without merit or unpreserved for our review.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: July 15, 2004
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)