Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Wilfredo POLANCO, Petitioner, v. Donald SELSKY, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, et al., Respondents.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Chemung County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner was found guilty of violating prison disciplinary rules prohibiting impersonations, making threats, committing an unhygienic act and harassment. The charges stemmed from two separate misbehavior reports, which alleged that petitioner sent letters to two prison employees, both of which contained threats to kill the employees and were sent under false names, and one of which had a stain on it that appeared to be semen. Both employees received numerous letters from petitioner in the past, some of which were introduced as exhibits, and they recognized petitioner's handwriting.
Given the misbehavior reports, the text of the letters, samples of petitioner's handwriting and the testimony of the two employees, we conclude that substantial evidence supports the determination of guilt (see Matter of Surdis v. Walsh, 295 A.D.2d 735, 736, 743 N.Y.S.2d 335 [2002] ). We also find no error in the Hearing Officer's decision to remove petitioner from the hearing given that petitioner engaged in objectionable conduct, even after being warned that such conduct could result in his removal (see Matter of Miller v. Goord, 2 A.D.3d 928, 930-931, 767 N.Y.S.2d 704 [2003] ). We have examined petitioner's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: July 22, 2004
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)