Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Jose RIVERA, Petitioner, v. Glenn S. GOORD, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner was found guilty of attempted assault on staff, making threats and being out of place in violation of various prison disciplinary rules. The misbehavior report indicates that petitioner lunged at a correction officer with his hand raised and yelled “quit messing with me woman” after the correction officer questioned his presence in the hallway. The misbehavior report, together with the corroborating testimony presented at the disciplinary hearing, provide substantial evidence to support the determination of petitioner's guilt (see, Matter of Mays v. Goord, 243 A.D.2d 882, 663 N.Y.S.2d 322). Although petitioner contends that the correction officer grabbed him by the throat rather than by the wrist when restraining him, this merely created a credibility issue which the Hearing Officer was free to resolve against petitioner (see, Matter of Heath v. Selsky, 245 A.D.2d 587, 664 N.Y.S.2d 883). In any event, even if true, the manner in which the correction officer restrained petitioner does not negate the determination of guilt. Petitioner's remaining contentions, including his claims of Hearing Officer bias, ineffective employee assistance and that he was denied the opportunity to prepare a defense, even if preserved for our review, have been reviewed and found to be without merit.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: September 10, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)