Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Westley WALNUT, Appellant.
Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Chemung County (Castellino, J.), rendered December 22, 1995, upon a verdict convicting defendant of the crimes of promoting prison contraband in the first degree and assault in the second degree.
While an inmate at Elmira Correctional Facility in Chemung County, defendant was indicted for promoting prison contraband in the first degree and assault in the second degree. Following a jury trial, defendant was convicted of both counts and sentenced, in absentia, as a second felony offender to concurrent prison terms of 31/212 to 7 years on each charge, to run consecutive to the sentence he was then serving. We reject defendant's contention that the criminal prosecution and conviction violated his constitutional protection against double jeopardy because he had already been punished in a prison disciplinary proceeding for the same incidents. It is well settled that State and Federal constitutional double jeopardy provisions do not protect a defendant from being sentenced in a criminal prosecution for conduct which had previously been the subject of prison disciplinary sanctions (see, People v. Vasquez, 89 N.Y.2d 521, 532-533, 655 N.Y.S.2d 870, 678 N.E.2d 482, cert. denied 522 U.S. 846, 118 S.Ct. 131, 139 L.Ed.2d 80; People v. Reyes, 240 A.D.2d 860, 658 N.Y.S.2d 722). Furthermore, we do not find the sentences to be so disproportionate to the crimes committed as to constitute cruel and unusual treatment.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: September 10, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)