Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Kenneth MOORE, Appellant, v. Glenn S. GOORD, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, Respondent.
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Lamont, J.), entered July 14, 2005 in Albany County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, granted respondent's motion to dismiss the petition.
In November 2004, petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination removing him from a temporary work release program. Respondent subsequently obtained two adjournments to file responsive papers and to locate the transcript of the temporary release hearing. Because the audiotape of the hearing could not be located, petitioner was given a rehearing on April 11, 2005, while this proceeding was pending. At the conclusion of the rehearing, petitioner was again removed from participation in the temporary work release program. Thereafter, respondent moved to dismiss the petition as moot based upon the disposition made as a result of the rehearing. Supreme Court granted the motion and this appeal ensued.
Initially, we note that the Temporary Release Committee was without authority to sua sponte order a rehearing to cure a procedural defect after a final determination had already been made and this appeal was pending (see Matter of Preston v. Coughlin, 164 A.D.2d 101, 102-103, 562 N.Y.S.2d 867 [1990] ). Nevertheless, a de novo hearing was the only relief to which petitioner would have been entitled upon annulment of the original determination (see Matter of Bell v. Recore, 276 A.D.2d 983, 983, 715 N.Y.S.2d 918 [2000]; see also Matter of Malik v. Coombe, 235 A.D.2d 872, 873, 653 N.Y.S.2d 168 [1997] ). Inasmuch as petitioner was already afforded such relief, Supreme Court properly dismissed the petition as moot (see Matter of Bell v. Recore, supra; Matter of Prescott v. Coughlin, 221 A.D.2d 785, 634 N.Y.S.2d 410 [1995] ).
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: July 27, 2006
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)