Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Injah E. TAFARI, Appellant, v. Donald SELSKY, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Kavanagh, J.), entered December 5, 2005 in Ulster County, which dismissed petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services finding petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.
Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with creating a disturbance after he started banging on his cell door and yelling at a captain who was making rounds on his floor. Although he initially attended the tier III disciplinary hearing, he refused to attend following two adjournments or to execute waiver forms. The Hearing Officer proceeded with the hearing in petitioner's absence and found him guilty of the charge. After the determination was affirmed on administrative appeal, petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding. Following joinder of issue, Supreme Court dismissed the petition, resulting in this appeal.
We affirm. The record reveals that the Hearing Officer took the necessary steps to ascertain the legitimacy of petitioner's refusal and unwillingness to sign a waiver by questioning the officers present at the time. Inasmuch as petitioner forfeited his right to attend the remainder of the hearing, the Hearing Officer properly continued it in his absence (see Matter of Shannon v. Goord, 284 A.D.2d 680, 728 N.Y.S.2d 507 [2001]; Matter of Dexter v. Goord, 257 A.D.2d 936, 685 N.Y.S.2d 134 [1999] ). By his conduct, petitioner waived his right to raise his procedural claim that he was denied witnesses (see Matter of Johnson v. Racette, 282 A.D.2d 899, 900, 723 N.Y.S.2d 414 [2001]; Matter of Kalwasinski v. Senkowski, 244 A.D.2d 738, 739, 664 N.Y.S.2d 841 [1997] ).
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: July 27, 2006
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)