Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Carlton McDONALD, Appellant.
Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Chemung County (Hayden, J.), rendered February 6, 2004, upon a verdict convicting defendant of two counts of the crime of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree.
After selling crack cocaine to an undercover informant on two separate occasions, defendant was charged with two counts of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree. Following a jury trial, he was convicted of both charges and was sentenced as a second felony offender to consecutive terms of 7 1/212 to 15 years in prison. Defendant now appeals.
His sole contention is that the sentence is harsh and excessive. Based upon our review of the record, we disagree. Defendant has an extensive criminal record dating back to his youth and the charges at issue appear to have arisen from defendant's participation in a pattern of drug-related activity. Under these circumstances, we cannot conclude that County Court abused its discretion in imposing consecutive sentences (see People v. Davis, 4 A.D.3d 567, 568, 770 N.Y.S.2d 914 [2004], lv. denied 2 N.Y.3d 798, 781 N.Y.S.2d 297, 814 N.E.2d 469 [2004]; People v. Parker, 305 A.D.2d 871, 872, 758 N.Y.S.2d 846 [2003], lv. denied 100 N.Y.2d 597, 766 N.Y.S.2d 173, 798 N.E.2d 357 [2003] ). We reach this conclusion notwithstanding the recent amendments to the Rockefeller Drug Laws, which defendant concedes were not in effect at the time he was sentenced.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: September 13, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)