Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Mario Roberto FLORES, appellant.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Brown, J.), rendered April 29, 2005, convicting him of murder in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and tampering with physical evidence, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
ORDERED that the judgment is modified, on the law, by vacating the conviction of murder in the second degree and vacating the sentence imposed thereon; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's conviction of depraved indifference murder (see Penal Law § 125.25[2] ) must be vacated, as that count of the indictment had been dismissed by another judge prior to trial and was later mistakenly submitted to the jury by the trial judge (see People v. Shampine, 31 A.D.3d 1163, 1164, 818 N.Y.S.2d 377; People v. Romero, 309 A.D.2d 953, 954, 766 N.Y.S.2d 369; People v. Smiley, 303 A.D.2d 425, 426, 755 N.Y.S.2d 870; People v. Harris, 229 A.D.2d 595, 595, 645 N.Y.S.2d 858).
The defendant's contention that the evidence against him was legally insufficient to establish his guilt of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05[2]; People v. Daniels, 35 A.D.3d 495, 496, 826 N.Y.S.2d 369). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620, 621, 467 N.Y.S.2d 349, 454 N.E.2d 932), the evidence as to this charge was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt (see People v. Daniels, supra; People v. Edwards, 29 A.D.3d 818, 819, 816 N.Y.S.2d 128).
The sentences imposed on the remaining counts of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and tampering with physical evidence were not excessive (see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675).
In light of the foregoing, the defendant's remaining contentions regarding the conviction for depraved indifference murder have been rendered academic.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: September 11, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)