Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Michael MAYS, Petitioner, v. Leonard PORTUONDO, as Superintendent of Shawangunk Correctional Facility, et al., Respondents.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Ulster County) to review a determination of respondent Superintendent of Shawangunk Correctional Facility which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules that prohibit refusing to obey a direct order and failing to comply with frisk procedures. Included in the evidence presented at the disciplinary hearing was the misbehavior report written by the correction officer directly involved in the incident, who related that petitioner was being pat frisked when he repeatedly refused orders to move his feet farther from the wall. The correction officer's supervising sergeant testified that he had witnessed petitioner's persistent refusals and that petitioner had also refused to comply with the sergeant's directive to move his feet.
We find the misbehavior report and the sergeant's testimony sufficient to constitute substantial evidence of petitioner's guilt (see, Matter of Barnes v. Goord, 279 A.D.2d 685, 718 N.Y.S.2d 890). Petitioner is mistaken in his contention that the correction officer who authored the report was required to testify (see, Matter of Rodriguez v. Senkowski, 202 A.D.2d 761, 762, 608 N.Y.S.2d 732).
Petitioner's assertions of Hearing Officer bias are not supported by the record nor has petitioner established that the outcome of the hearing flowed therefrom (see, Matter of Lawrence v. Headley, 257 A.D.2d 837, 838, 685 N.Y.S.2d 118). The remaining arguments made by petitioner have been reviewed and found to be without merit.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
CARDONA, P.J., MERCURE, SPAIN, ROSE and LAHTINEN, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: October 18, 2001
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)