Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: George WILSON, Petitioner, v. Donald SELSKY, as Director of Special Housing, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule that prohibits the use of a controlled substance after his urine twice tested positive for the presence of opiates. Substantial evidence was presented at the hearing supporting the determination of petitioner's guilt in the form of the misbehavior report, the positive results of the urinalysis tests and the testimony of the correction officer who obtained the urine sample, performed the testing and drafted the misbehavior report (see, Matter of Myers v. Goord, 274 A.D.2d 801, 711 N.Y.S.2d 920). Additional evidence was presented demonstrating that the testing was performed in accordance with applicable procedures and that the chain of custody of the tested specimen was unbroken (see, Matter of Terry v. Goord, 272 A.D.2d 701, 702, 708 N.Y.S.2d 909).
Petitioner's claim of Hearing Officer bias is not supported by the record, which discloses that the hearing was conducted in a fair and impartial manner. There is no indication that the determination under review was influenced by anything other than the substantial evidence of petitioner's guilt (see, Matter of Barnes v. Selsky, 278 A.D.2d 707, 708, 718 N.Y.S.2d 110). Petitioner's remaining contentions have been reviewed and found to be without merit.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: October 18, 2001
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)