Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Horace CUNNINGHAM, appellant, v. BAY SHORE MIDDLE SCHOOL, et al., respondents.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, (R. Doyle, J.), dated March 27, 2007, which granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiff allegedly was injured when he slipped and fell on a wet hallway floor in the defendant Bay Shore Middle School. The plaintiff commenced this personal injury action against the Bay Shore Middle School and the defendant Bay Shore Union Free School District alleging, inter alia, that the defendants' employees created the wet condition by mopping the floor.
To establish a prima facie case of negligence, a plaintiff in a slip-and-fall action must demonstrate that the defendant either created the condition that caused the accident, or had actual or constructive notice thereof (see Luciani v. Waldbaum, Inc., 304 A.D.2d 537, 756 N.Y.S.2d 886; Goldman v. Waldbaum, Inc., 297 A.D.2d 277, 746 N.Y.S.2d 44). The defendants made a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by presenting proof that they neither created nor had actual or constructive notice of the wet condition that allegedly caused the plaintiff to fall (see Gwyn v. 575 Fifth Ave. Assoc., 12 A.D.3d 403, 404, 784 N.Y.S.2d 579; Seneglia v. FPL Foods, 273 A.D.2d 221, 709 N.Y.S.2d 842). In opposition, the plaintiff, who speculated that the defendants' employees created the wet condition by mopping the floor within 15 minutes immediately preceding his fall (see Glacy v. 1109 Manhattan Ave. Hous. Dev. Fund Corp., 8 A.D.3d 227, 777 N.Y.S.2d 662), failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see Gwyn v. 575 Fifth Ave. Assoc., 12 A.D.3d at 404, 784 N.Y.S.2d 579). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: October 21, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)