Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Edward GLADDEN, Petitioner, v. Donald SELSKY, as Director of Special Housing/Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.
Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule prohibiting possession of a weapon. The correction officer who authored the misbehavior report testified that he was performing a routine search of petitioner's single-occupancy room when he found a homemade weapon secreted behind an access panel over the sink. The weapon was fashioned out of a razor blade that had been melted into the handle of a plastic utensil.
The detailed misbehavior report and the testimony of the correction officer who authored it constitute substantial evidence of petitioner's guilt (see, Matter of Ellington v. Goord, 290 A.D.2d 919, 920, 736 N.Y.S.2d 639). Petitioner's testimony that the area behind the access panel was equally accessible to the inmate housed in the adjacent room was refuted by the Hearing Officer's personal inspection of both rooms. Hence, there was no evidence to undermine the general inference that contraband found within an area under an inmate's direct control is in that inmate's possession even though access to the area may not be exclusive (see, Matter of Jackson v. Selsky, 288 A.D.2d 802, 733 N.Y.S.2d 527). Petitioner's denial of any knowledge of the weapon presented an issue of credibility for resolution by the Hearing Officer. The remaining contentions raised by petitioner have been examined and found to be without merit.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: July 11, 2002
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)