Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Jacques L. RIVETTE, Petitioner, v. Patrick J. McGRATH, as Judge of the County Court of Rensselaer County, et al., Respondents.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (initiated in this court pursuant to CPLR 506[b][1] ) to prohibit respondent Rensselaer County Judge from enforcing an order appointing respondent Peter J. Moschetti Jr. as special prosecutor in a criminal action against petitioner.
Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding in the nature of prohibition, claiming that respondent Rensselaer County Judge (hereinafter respondent) acted in excess of his authority in appointing a special prosecutor to represent the People in a criminal matter against him. Petitioner has already been convicted of the charges contained in the indictment filed against him and his appeal from this conviction is now pending.
The question of the exercise of respondent's discretion in appointing a special prosecutor under County Law § 701 is not the proper subject for review in a CPLR article 78 proceeding which requests relief by way of prohibition (see, Matter of Kavanagh v. Vogt, 58 N.Y.2d 678, 679, 458 N.Y.S.2d 527, 444 N.E.2d 991; Matter of Dentes v. Friedlander, 167 A.D.2d 757, 563 N.Y.S.2d 319). Inasmuch as petitioner has an adequate remedy at law, i.e., direct appeal from his conviction (see, Matter of Carney v. Feldstein, 193 A.D.2d 1016, 1017, 597 N.Y.S.2d 982), this proceeding must be dismissed (see, Matter of State of New York v. King, 36 N.Y.2d 59, 62, 364 N.Y.S.2d 879, 324 N.E.2d 351).
ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, without costs.
CASEY, Justice.
MIKOLL, J.P., and CREW, YESAWICH and SPAIN, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: July 17, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)