Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Christine SEQUIST, respondent, v. COUNTY OF PUTNAM, et al., appellants.
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR Article 78 to review so much of a determination of Robert J. Bondi, as County Executive of Putnam County, dated May 27, 2005, as rejected the recommendation of a hearing officer dated May 9, 2005, that the petitioner be suspended from her employment as a bus driver for a period of 30 days, made after a hearing, and terminated the petitioner's employment as a bus driver, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Putnam County (O'Rourke, J.), dated September 21, 2005, which granted the petition, annulled so much of the determination as rejected the recommendation of the hearing officer that the petitioner be suspended from her employment as a bus driver for a period of 30 days and terminated the petitioner's employment as a bus driver, and directed reinstatement of the petitioner to her former position as a bus driver.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Under the circumstances presented here, the penalty of termination of the petitioner's employment was so disproportionate to the offense committed as to be shocking to one's sense of fairness (see Matter of Pell v. Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. No. 1 of Towns of Scarsdale and Mamaroneck, Westchester County, 34 N.Y.2d 222, 356 N.Y.S.2d 833, 313 N.E.2d 321). The petitioner had 14 years of exemplary service as an employee of the County of Putnam with no prior disciplinary problems, and she expressed remorse for her misconduct (see Matter of Senior v. Board of Educ. of Byram Hills Cent. School Dist., 37 A.D.3d 610, 829 N.Y.S.2d 707; Matter of Schnaars v. Copiague Union Free School Dist., 275 A.D.2d 462, 713 N.Y.S.2d 84). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the petition, annulled so much of the determination as rejected the recommendation of the hearing officer that the petitioner be suspended from her employment as a bus driver for a period of 30 days and terminated the petitioner's employment, and directed reinstatement of the petitioner to her former position of employment.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: May 22, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)