Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Izabel RODRIGUEZ, respondent, v. CITY OF MOUNT VERNON, appellant, et al., defendants.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant City of Mount Vernon appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Nicolai, J.), entered April 6, 2007, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.
ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion of the defendant City of Mount Vernon for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it is granted.
A municipality that has enacted a prior written notice law is excused from liability absent proof of prior written notice or an exception thereto (see Poirier v. City of Schenectady, 85 N.Y.2d 310, 313, 624 N.Y.S.2d 555, 648 N.E.2d 1318; Smith v. Town of Brookhaven, 45 A.D.3d 567, 846 N.Y.S.2d 203). The Court of Appeals has recognized two exceptions to this rule, “namely, where the locality created the defect or hazard through an affirmative act of negligence and where a ‘special use’ confers a special benefit upon the locality” (Amabile v. City of Buffalo, 93 N.Y.2d 471, 474, 693 N.Y.S.2d 77, 715 N.E.2d 104; see Delgado v. County of Suffolk, 40 A.D.3d 575, 575-576, 835 N.Y.S.2d 379). Here, the defendant City of Mount Vernon established its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by demonstrating that it did not have prior written notice of the allegedly dangerous condition that purportedly caused the plaintiff's fall (see Smith v. Town of Brookhaven, 45 A.D.3d at 568, 846 N.Y.S.2d 203; Jacobs v. Village of Rockville Ctr., 41 A.D.3d 539, 540, 838 N.Y.S.2d 597). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Under the circumstances of this case, we disagree with the plaintiff's contention that the City is estopped from claiming, as a defense, the absence of prior written notice to the proper statutory designee (cf. Gorman v. Town of Huntington, 47 A.D.3d 30, 844 N.Y.S.2d 421). Accordingly, the Supreme Court should have granted the City's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: May 20, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)