IN RE: Jaye MILLER (2008)

In a child custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (O'Shea, J.), dated March 26, 2007, which, after a hearing, awarded sole custody of the subject child to the father.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

 The Family Court did not err in awarding permanent custody to the father.   The determination of the Family Court in a custody dispute is generally accorded great deference on appeal, and should not be disturbed unless it lacks a sound and substantial basis in the record, as it is based upon a first-hand assessment of the parties, their credibility, their character, and their temperament (see Matter of Garcia v. Perez, 48 A.D.3d 812, 853 N.Y.S.2d 141).   There is no basis here to disturb the Family Court's determination.

 To the extent that the mother raises issues regarding the temporary custody order, those issues are academic.   The order awarding the father temporary custody of the child was superseded by the order awarding him permanent custody, and the temporary order is no longer of any effect.   Any alleged defect in the temporary order does not render defective the permanent order, which was based upon a full and fair hearing (see Cucinello v. Cucinello, 234 A.D.2d 365, 651 N.Y.S.2d 93).