Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Claim of Karen APOSPOROS, Respondent, v. NYNEX et al., Appellants, Special Disability Fund, Respondent. Workers' Compensation Board, Respondent.
Appeal from a decision of the Workers' Compensation Board, filed December 13, 2006, which ruled that Workers' Compensation Law § 25–a did not apply.
As a result of pain and numbness of various parts of her body which developed during her employment, claimant applied for workers' compensation benefits in May 1996 claiming injury to her neck and both wrists. In February 1997, a compensable injury was established for her left wrist while determinations with regard to other injury sites were held in abeyance. Thereafter, in May 1999, her claim was amended to include her neck and left shoulder, and the Workers' Compensation Law Judge noted that no further action was contemplated at that time. As is pertinent here, claimant submitted a request for further action in March 2006 in order to establish an injury to her right wrist. In light of the time that had elapsed between the dates of claimant's injury and the last payment of benefits and the date of her request to reopen, the employer asserted that the Special Disability Fund was liable pursuant to Workers' Compensation Law § 25–a. A Workers' Compensation Law Judge determined that the Fund was not liable and, finding that there had not been a true closing of the case, the Workers' Compensation Board agreed. The employer now appeals.
The applicability of Workers' Compensation Law § 25–a depends upon whether the case has been officially closed, and the Board's determination of this question of fact will not be disturbed if substantial evidence supports it (see Matter of Washburn v. Bob Hooey Constr. Co., 39 A.D.3d 956, 957–958, 833 N.Y.S.2d 696 [2007]; Matter of Granberry v. JCCA Edenwald, Inc., 33 A.D.3d 1102, 1103, 823 N.Y.S.2d 550 [2006] ). Turning to claimant's case, the record reveals that the injury to claimant's right wrist was raised in her initial 1996 C–3 claim form, referenced in paperwork submitted by the employer, and consistently documented in medical reports throughout the proceedings. Inasmuch as the issue of injury to claimant's right wrist was raised and remained unresolved, we decline to disturb the Board's determination that the case was not truly closed (see Matter of Stanford v. Lewis County Opportunities, 33 A.D.3d 1098, 1099–1100, 822 N.Y.S.2d 341 [2006]; Matter of Granberry v. JCCA Edenwald, Inc., 33 A.D.3d at 1103, 823 N.Y.S.2d 550).
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
CARDONA, P.J.
CREW III, MUGGLIN, ROSE and KANE, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 503138
Decided: December 06, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)