Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Lavogia JACKSON, Petitioner, v. Joseph T. SMITH, as Superintendent of Shawangunk Correctional Facility, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Ulster County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Following a tier II disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of disobeying a direct order, being out of place and leaving an assigned area without authorization. Upon administrative appeal, the charge of disobeying a direct order was dismissed, but the determination was otherwise affirmed and the penalty imposed was not modified. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.
Contrary to petitioner's contentions, the misbehavior report and the hearing testimony of the correction officer who authored it provide substantial evidence to support the determination finding him guilty of being out of place and leaving an assigned area without authorization (see Matter of Galdamez v. Goord, 43 A.D.3d 1237, 1238, 841 N.Y.S.2d 715 [2007]; Matter of Brown v. Katz, 26 A.D.3d 559, 559, 807 N.Y.S.2d 732 [2006] ). Petitioner's contrary testimony created a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see Matter of Ohnmacht v. Goord, 47 A.D.3d 1030, 850 N.Y.S.2d 245, 246 [2008] ), as did his claim that the charges were issued in retaliation for a grievance he had filed (see Matter of Porter v. Goord, 47 A.D.3d 978, 979, 849 N.Y.S.2d 326, 327 [2008] ).
Petitioner's remaining claims, including his claim that the hearing was not timely completed, have been reviewed and found to be without merit.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: March 06, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)