Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Gregory John FISCHER, appellant, v. SUFFOLK COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, et al., respondents.
In a proceeding pursuant to Election Law § 16-102, inter alia, to validate a petition designating Gregory John Fischer as the candidate of the Democratic Party for the public office of State Senator for the 1st Senatorial District, the petitioner appeals from a final order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Weber, J.), entered August 19, 2008, which, among other things, denied the petition to validate and dismissed the proceeding.
ORDERED that the final order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The Supreme Court properly determined that the appellant's petition to validate was insufficiently pleaded as a matter of law. A validating petition must specify the individual determinations of a board of elections that the candidate claims were erroneous, including the signatures that the candidate claims were improperly invalidated (see Matter of Krueger v. Richards, 59 N.Y.2d 680, 682, 463 N.Y.S.2d 413, 450 N.E.2d 219; Matter of Jennings v. Board of Elections of City of N.Y., 32 A.D.3d 486, 819 N.Y.S.2d 487; Matter of Green v. Mahr, 231 A.D.2d 480, 646 N.Y.S.2d 889). Here, since the appellant's validating petition was not sufficiently particularized to give the Supreme Court and the parties notice of the determinations of the Suffolk County Board of Elections which were claimed to be erroneous or the signatures that the appellant claimed were improperly invalidated (see CPLR 3013), the petition to validate was properly denied by the Supreme Court (see Matter of Jennings v. Board of Elections of City of N.Y., 32 A.D.3d at 486-487, 819 N.Y.S.2d 487; Matter of Jannaccio v. Board of Elections of City of N.Y., 297 A.D.2d 355, 746 N.Y.S.2d 408; Matter of Green v. Mahr, 231 A.D.2d at 480-481, 646 N.Y.S.2d 889).
In light of this determination, we do not reach the appellant's remaining contentions.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: October 16, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)