Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Julio DELOSSANTOS, appellant.
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his brief, from a sentence of the County Court, Rockland County (Kelly, J.), imposed January 30, 2003, upon his conviction of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, the sentence being an indeterminate term of seven years to life imprisonment.
ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.
The defendant, who was convicted, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, a class A-II felony, seeks resentencing under the provisions of the Drug Law Reform Act (L. 2004, ch. 738) (hereinafter the DLRA). With exceptions not pertinent here, the DLRA itself does not permit retroactive application of its provisions to persons who committed crimes prior to its effective date of January 13, 2005 (see People v. Dickerson, 28 A.D.3d 787, 813 N.Y.S.2d 544; People v. Mann, 28 A.D.3d 791, 813 N.Y.S.2d 545). The defendant took and perfected this appeal prior to the October 29, 2005, effective date of a post-DLRA statute-L. 2005, ch. 643. The latter statute, in effect, permits the retroactive application of the new sentencing structure of the DLRA to defendants convicted of class A-II felonies (see People v. Dickerson, supra; People v. Mann, supra ). However, the defendant must follow the procedure of L. 2005, ch. 643, which requires, inter alia, that he apply, on notice to the District Attorney, for resentencing in the court which imposed the original sentence. That court must then make a determination of that application, according to the procedures detailed in L. 2005, ch. 643, subject to appellate review according to the terms of the new statute.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: July 11, 2006
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)