Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Joseph B. STURGIS, an Attorney and Counselor-at-Law. Committee on Professional Standards, Petitioner, Joseph B. Sturgis, Respondent.
Respondent, a Pennsylvania attorney admitted in that jurisdiction in 1960, was admitted to practice in New York by this court in 1985.
By order of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dated December 18, 1996, respondent was disbarred in that jurisdiction upon his consent after submitting a resignation statement. The resignation stated, among other things, that he could not successfully defend himself against allegations that he had used deceptive schemes to siphon moneys, to which he was not entitled, from the law firm of which he was managing partner and used the moneys for his own personal benefit.
Petitioner, the Committee on Professional Standards, moves to reciprocally discipline respondent pursuant to section 806.19 (22 NYCRR 806.19) of this court's rules. Respondent has made no reply to the motion.
In view of respondent's disbarment in Pennsylvania and his failure to appear upon or oppose the instant motion, petitioner's motion is granted. We further determine that the ends of justice will be served by imposing the same discipline in this jurisdiction as was imposed in Pennsylvania (see, e.g., Matter of Taub, 217 A.D.2d 742, 628 N.Y.S.2d 614). Therefore, respondent is hereby disbarred, effective immediately.
ORDERED that petitioner's motion is granted; and it is further
ORDERED that respondent is disbarred and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law, effective immediately; and it is further
ORDERED that respondent is commanded to desist and refrain from the practice of law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk or employee of another; and he hereby is forbidden to appear as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, judge, justice, board, commission or other public authority or to give any opinion as to the law or its application, or any advice in relation thereto; and it is further
ORDERED that respondent shall comply with the provisions of section 806.9 (22 NYCRR 806.9) of this court's rules governing disbarred attorneys.
PER CURIAM.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: September 17, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)