Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Ronnie COLE, Appellant, v. Glenn S. GOORD, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, et al., Respondents.
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (McNamara, J.), entered January 11, 2007 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner, an inmate, commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking to annul a tier III disciplinary determination finding him guilty of drug possession and smuggling. Supreme Court dismissed the petition, prompting this appeal.
We affirm. While the form authorizing the strip search was not signed by a sergeant or higher ranking officer as required by Department of Correctional Services Directive No. 4910, the record establishes that the search was, in fact, authorized by a correction sergeant and petitioner has not demonstrated that he has been prejudiced by the technical defect (see Matter of Motzer v. Goord, 273 A.D.2d 559, 559-560, 709 N.Y.S.2d 670 [2000]; Matter of Roman v. Selsky, 270 A.D.2d 519, 520, 705 N.Y.S.2d 88 [2000] ). Moreover, contrary to petitioner's contention, the record reflects that probable cause existed, including information provided by a confidential informant, to conduct a strip search (see Department of Correctional Services Directive No. 4910[III][F] ).
Finally, petitioner's remaining claims are not properly before us as he did not raise them in his petition (see Matter of Pigmentel v. Selsky, 19 A.D.3d 816, 817, 797 N.Y.S.2d 160 [2005]; Matter of Reid v. Goord, 14 A.D.3d 950, 951, 787 N.Y.S.2d 917 [2005] ).
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: January 24, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)