PEOPLE v. JIE MEI CHEN (2006)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. JIE MEI CHEN, appellant.

Decided: February 07, 2006

STEPHEN G. CRANE, J.P., WILLIAM F. MASTRO, REINALDO E. RIVERA, and ROBERT A. SPOLZINO, JJ.

Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Warren S. Landau of counsel), for appellant. Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (Gary Fidel, John M. Castellano, and Johnnette Traill of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant, by permission, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rosengarten, J.), dated March 20, 2004, as, after a hearing, in effect, upon reargument, adhered to its prior determination in an order dated March 21, 2001, denying his motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 to vacate a judgment of the same court (Finnegan, J.), rendered August 19, 1997.

ORDERED that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, and upon reargument, the order dated March 21, 2001, is vacated, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for a hearing consistent herewith, before a different justice, and a new determination.

Under the particular circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court should have appointed counsel to represent the defendant at the hearing on his motion, in effect, for leave to reargue his prior motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 to vacate a judgment rendered August 19, 1997.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network