Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: JAVON T. (Anonymous). Nassau County Department of Social Services, respondent; Ashley T. (Anonymous), appellant.
In a child neglect proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Greenberg, J.), dated January 25, 2008, which granted the motion of the Nassau County Department of Social Services for summary judgment finding that she had neglected the subject child.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The court properly granted the motion of the Nassau County Department of Social Services for summary judgment based on the mother's criminal conviction of an offense arising out of the same conduct alleged in the petition (see Matter of Tali W., 299 A.D.2d 413, 750 N.Y.S.2d 104; Matter of Christopher B., 283 A.D.2d 424, 723 N.Y.S.2d 882). A determination in a criminal action may be given collateral estoppel effect in a Family Court proceeding where the identical issue has been resolved, and the defendant in the criminal action had a full and fair opportunity to litigate the issue of his or her criminal conduct (see Matter of Ajay P., 60 A.D.3d 681, 875 N.Y.S.2d 149; Matter of Desiree C., 7 A.D.3d 522, 776 N.Y.S.2d 320). Here, the acts for which the mother was convicted in criminal court were the same acts alleged in the neglect petition. The agency satisfied its burden of establishing the identicalness of the issues presented in the neglect proceeding and the criminal action (see Matter of Suffolk County Dept. of Social Servs. v. James M., 83 N.Y.2d 178, 608 N.Y.S.2d 940, 630 N.E.2d 636; Matter of Ajay P., 60 A.D.3d 681, 875 N.Y.S.2d 149).
The mother's contention that her allocution at the criminal plea proceeding was insufficient to support a finding of neglect is without merit. The mother's admissions at her allocution showed that she failed to exercise a minimum degree of care in providing the child with proper supervision or guardianship, thus placing the child's physical, mental, or emotional condition in imminent danger of becoming impaired (see Family Ct. Act § 1012[f][i][B] ).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: July 07, 2009
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)