Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Raymond YANCEY, Petitioner, v. James CONWAY, as Superintendent of Attica Correctional Facility, et al., Respondents.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
A search of petitioner's prison cell resulted in the discovery of an ice-pick type weapon and a quantity of marihuana. Consequently, petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with possession of a weapon and possession of drugs. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of both charges. Upon administrative review, that determination was affirmed with a modified penalty. Petitioner then commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding.
We confirm. The determination of guilt is supported by substantial evidence including the detailed misbehavior report and extensive hearing testimony (see Matter of Johnson v. Goord, 27 A.D.3d 859, 860, 810 N.Y.S.2d 255 [2006] ). Petitioner's allegation that the contraband had been “planted” in his cell by a correction officer created a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see Matter of Nijman v. Goord, 294 A.D.2d 737, 737, 744 N.Y.S.2d 51 [2002] ). As for petitioner's assertion that the Hearing Officer was biased, it is neither substantiated by the record nor is there any indication that the determination flowed from any alleged bias (see Matter of McKinley v. Goord, 40 A.D.3d 1280, 1280, 836 N.Y.S.2d 349 [2007], lv. denied 9 N.Y.3d 807, 843 N.Y.S.2d 536, 875 N.E.2d 29 [2007] ). We have considered petitioner's remaining contentions, including his claims that his cell was improperly searched, the misbehavior report was deficient and the chain of custody relative to the marihuana was not appropriately established, and find them to be unavailing.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: December 13, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)