IN RE: MERCURY INSURANCE GROUP (2008)

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to permanently stay arbitration of an uninsured motorist claim, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Pitts, J.), dated March 1, 2007, which, after a framed-issue hearing, denied the petition, and, in effect, dismissed the proceeding.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs to the respondent State Farm Insurance.

Mercury Insurance Group (hereinafter Mercury) commenced this proceeding to permanently stay arbitration of a claim for uninsured motorist benefits brought by its insured, Maria Ortiz.   Mercury alleged that on the date of the alleged incident, October 10, 2003, the vehicle owned and operated by the alleged tortfeasor, Stephen M. Sontag, was insured by State Farm Insurance (hereinafter State Farm).   After a framed-issue hearing on whether State Farm had properly canceled that policy prior to October 10, 2003, the court denied the petition, and, in effect, dismissed the proceeding.

Strict compliance with Vehicle and Traffic Law § 313 is required for a notice of termination to be deemed effective as to third parties (see Vehicle and Traffic Law § 313[1], [2];  Matter of Progressive N. Ins. Co. v. White, 23 A.D.3d 477, 478, 808 N.Y.S.2d 108;  Matter of Travelers Indemn. Co. v. Shepard, 125 A.D.2d 681, 681-682, 509 N.Y.S.2d 867).   Contrary to Mercury's contention, the evidence adduced at the framed-issue hearing demonstrated that State Farm's termination of Sontag's policy, effective on August 22, 2003, complied with Vehicle and Traffic Law § 313(1) and (2).   Accordingly, because State Farm's policy for the Sontag vehicle was no longer in effect on the date of the alleged incident, the Supreme Court properly denied Mercury's petition to permanently stay arbitration and directed the parties to proceed to arbitration.