Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Claim of Peter F. FOLDES, Appellant. John E. Sweeney, as Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 24, 1996, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.
Claimant, employed by a hospital as a plumber, was discharged after he failed to complete two plumbing assignments and left the hospital premises to go to the hospital's personnel office in contravention of his supervisor's directions. An arbitration hearing ensued which resulted in a finding that claimant had violated the terms of his last-chance employment agreement, thereby justifying his discharge. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, relying upon the arbitrator's decision, ruled that claimant was guilty of disqualifying misconduct. We affirm. The arbitrator's decision was properly given collateral estoppel effect by the Board inasmuch as claimant was given a full and fair opportunity to litigate the issues surrounding his termination before the arbitrator (see, Matter of Kilgore [Triboro Coach Corp.-Sweeney], 227 A.D.2d 710, 641 N.Y.S.2d 648; Matter of Regan [Coca Cola Bottling Co. of N.Y.-Sweeney], 226 A.D.2d 825, 640 N.Y.S.2d 633). Furthermore, substantial evidence supports the Board's finding that claimant engaged in disqualifying misconduct (see, id.). Claimant's remaining contentions have been examined and found to be lacking in merit.
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: July 17, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)