Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the CLAIM OF Roger A. LEMKE, Appellant. John E. Sweeney, as Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 31, 1996, which ruled that claimant's unemployment insurance benefit rate should be reduced to zero.
Claimant contributed 7% of the salary he earned as a Federal government employee to a pension fund, an amount which was matched or exceeded by his employer. When claimant's employment ended after 36 years, he began to receive monthly pension payments in excess of $4,000. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruled that claimant's benefit rate was subject to reduction by the amount of his pension payments, thereby reducing his benefit rate to zero. We affirm. Pursuant to Labor Law § 600(7)(b), a claimant's benefit rate is to be reduced when he or she receives payments from a pension fund to which a base period employer has contributed (see, Matter of D'Angelo [Sweeney], 240 A.D.2d 800, 658 N.Y.S.2d 514; Matter of Favorito [Hudacs], 195 A.D.2d 679, 599 N.Y.S.2d 717, lv. denied 82 N.Y.2d 660, 605 N.Y.S.2d 5, 625 N.E.2d 590). Given claimant's life expectancy at the time of his retirement, his contributions to his pension fund were approximately 12.57% of its actuarial value. We conclude that the Board's decision reducing claimant's benefit rate to zero is supported by substantial evidence and it is, accordingly, affirmed (see, Matter of Mareno [Roberts], 113 A.D.2d 987, 493 N.Y.S.2d 660, lv. dismissed 67 N.Y.2d 1004, 502 N.Y.S.2d 1005, 494 N.E.2d 110, cert. denied 479 U.S. 878, 107 S.Ct. 264, 93 L.Ed.2d 241).
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: October 23, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)