Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Claim of Judith A. ANASTASIO, Appellant. John E. Sweeney, as Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed June 6, 1996, which ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits for failure to file a valid original claim.
Claimant was employed by a Methodist church as the director of its preschool, overseeing the staff and planning the curriculum. After her employment ended, claimant was found to be ineligible for unemployment insurance benefits pursuant to Labor Law § 563(2)(c), which provides an exclusion from benefits for any “person employed at a place of religious worship * * * for the performance of duties of a religious nature”. Substantial evidence supports the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board's ruling. Although claimant's duties included secular responsibilities characteristic of any preschool director, she also instituted the recitation of prayers by the students before partaking of food and she oversaw a curriculum that included Christian themes, holidays, ethics and prayers, and, in the words of one witness, involved “incorporating Christian teachings into the decision making of everyday life” (see, Matter of Hollis Hills Jewish Ctr. [Roberts], 92 A.D.2d 1039, 461 N.Y.S.2d 555; see generally, Matter of Klein [Hartnett], 78 N.Y.2d 662, 578 N.Y.S.2d 498, 585 N.E.2d 809, cert. denied 504 U.S. 912, 112 S.Ct. 1945, 118 L.Ed.2d 550). While claimant testified that her job was devoid of religious elements, this presented issues of fact and credibility for resolution by the Board (see, Matter of Del Grosso [Sweeney], 217 A.D.2d 873, 874, 629 N.Y.S.2d 549).
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 06, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)