Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Claim of Michael A. TENORE, Appellant. John E. Sweeney, as Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 14, 1996, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was not totally unemployed.
While collecting unemployment insurance benefits, claimant failed to report his involvement in his father's taxi business to the local unemployment insurance office. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board subsequently found him ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits on the ground that he was not totally unemployed. In addition, the Board charged him with a recoverable overpayment of benefits and assessed a forfeiture penalty of 292 benefit days upon finding that he had made willful false statements to obtain benefits.
We reject claimant's contention that there is no evidence to support the Board's finding that claimant made willful false statements to obtain benefits. The record reveals that claimant was an authorized signatory on the business checking account and routinely wrote checks on its behalf. Although claimant maintains that he was not involved in the business while he was unemployed and wrote checks only to help his ailing father, the record discloses that claimant signed yearly Federal income tax returns for the corporation, was a 50% shareholder and was listed as its president on another official document. This, coupled with claimant's admitted failure to read the information booklet distributed by the local office, constitutes substantial evidence supporting the Board's conclusion that claimant made willful false statements to obtain benefits (see, Matter of Hilburger [Hudacs], 183 A.D.2d 1016, 583 N.Y.S.2d 670). Consequently, we find no reason to disturb the Board's decision.
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 20, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)