Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Juan HEFFELFINGER, appellant.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (DiFiore, J.), rendered December 16, 2002, convicting him of robbery in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant pleaded guilty to robbery in the second degree with the understanding that he would receive the statutory minimum term of imprisonment of 3 1/212 years (see Penal Law § § 70.02[3][b], 160.10). He admitted his guilt and acknowledged that he was pleading guilty on the ground that he was in fact guilty. He was informed that if he was arrested before sentencing and did not appear for sentencing, the sentence commitment was no longer binding.
Thereafter, the defendant failed to appear for sentencing and was arrested pursuant to a warrant. At the sentencing proceeding, the defendant moved to withdraw his plea of guilty on the ground that the People had promised him a lesser sentence if he acted as a confidential informant on their behalf. However, he acknowledged that he stopped cooperating because he feared retribution and because he was incarcerated on a new charge. The Supreme Court denied the defendant's motion and imposed the statutory minimum term of imprisonment of 3 1/212 years.
Since it is apparent that the defendant failed to cooperate, he was not entitled to withdrawal of his plea of guilty or any other consideration (see People v. DeBoue, 299 A.D.2d 422, 749 N.Y.S.2d 282; People v. Kloczkowski, 226 A.D.2d 743, 642 N.Y.S.2d 35).
The defendant's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel involves matter dehors the record which may not be reviewed on direct appeal (see People v. Simon, 196 A.D.2d 851, 852, 602 N.Y.S.2d 29).
The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.
H. MILLER, J.P., RIVERA, LIFSON and SKELOS, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 13, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)