Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Claim of James J. PASCARELLA, Respondent. New York State Thruway Authority, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 10, 2007, which dismissed the employer's appeal from a decision of the Administrative Law Judge as untimely.
By decision dated and mailed August 16, 2007, an Administrative Law Judge (hereinafter ALJ) overruled the initial determination finding, among other things, that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he had refused a suitable offer of employment, and awarded benefits. During a hearing to determine the timeliness of the employer's September 11, 2007 appeal, the employer's representatives admitted to receiving the ALJ's decision shortly after it was mailed but testified that the delay in requesting an appeal was due to the mistaken belief that the employer had 30 days, as opposed to 20 days, within which to do so. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board dismissed the employer's appeal as untimely, prompting this appeal.
We affirm. Labor Law § 621(1) requires that an appeal to the Board from an ALJ's decision must be made within 20 days of the date the decision is mailed or personally delivered (see Matter of Uwaezuoke [Commissioner of Labor], 57 A.D.3d 1193, 870 N.Y.S.2d 499 [2008]; Matter of Bottex [Commissioner of Labor], 48 A.D.3d 855, 856, 851 N.Y.S.2d 283 [2008] ), and the statutory time limit is strictly construed (see Matter of Moorer [Commissioner of Labor], 40 A.D.3d 1335, 836 N.Y.S.2d 373 [2007] ). Neither the employer's failure to fully read those portions of the ALJ's decision advising of the time period for filing an appeal (see Matter of Bottex [Commissioner of Labor], 48 A.D.3d at 856, 851 N.Y.S.2d 283) nor its mistaken belief that it had more time to appeal (see Matter of Trinidad [Commissioner of Labor], 21 A.D.3d 1208, 1208-1209, 801 N.Y.S.2d 108 [2005] ) constitutes a reasonable excuse for failing to comply with the statutory time period. Accordingly, we discern no basis upon which to disturb the Board's decision dismissing the appeal as untimely (see Matter of Uwaezuoke [Commissioner of Labor], supra ).
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 19, 2009
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)