Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Stephanie A. CONGDON, Appellant.
Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Montgomery County (Sise, J.), rendered September 17, 1997, convicting defendant upon her plea of guilty of the crime of burglary in the third degree.
Defendant waived indictment and pleaded guilty to a superior court information charging her with the crime of burglary in the third degree with the understanding that she would be sentenced to a prison term of 2 to 6 years and would not be granted youthful offender status. Nonetheless, at the time of sentencing, County Court permitted defense counsel to present certain alleged mitigating circumstances in support of defendant's claim that youthful offender status was warranted. Upon considering the relevant factors, County Court declined defendant's request for youthful offender treatment and sentenced her to the agreed-upon prison term. Defendant appeals.
We affirm. Given that defendant's guilty plea also included a waiver of her right to appeal, which the record reveals was knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently entered, defendant has failed to preserve her present contention that County Court abused its discretion in failing to adjudicate her a youthful offender (see, People v. Allen, 259 A.D.2d 835, 686 N.Y.S.2d 216; People v. Fletcher, 245 A.D.2d 978, 979, 667 N.Y.S.2d 131). In any event, were we to consider defendant's argument, we would reject it as lacking in merit. Notwithstanding defendant's lack of a prior criminal history and her limited participation in the crime charged, given the serious nature of the crime, which involved the robbery and assault of three elderly sisters in their home, and defendant's understanding that she would not be adjudicated a youthful offender as part of the plea agreement (see, People v. Martin, 254 A.D.2d 629, 681 N.Y.S.2d 614; People v. Lloyd, 249 A.D.2d 623, 670 N.Y.S.2d 814), we find no abuse of discretion in County Court's denial of youthful offender status.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
PETERS, J.
CARDONA, P.J., CARPINELLO, GRAFFEO and MUGGLIN, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 03, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)