Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Pacific T. GIORDANO II, an Attorney and Counselor-at-Law. Committee on Professional Standards, Petitioner; Pacific T. Giordano II, Respondent.
Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1996. He resides in Connecticut.
In February 2001, respondent was convicted in Connecticut Superior Court upon his plea of guilty to the felony offense of larceny in the first degree (Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53a-122). His conviction arose out of his issuance of one or more checks from his attorney-at-law account returned for insufficient funds. He was sentenced to five years' probation and ordered, among other things, to make restitution of $264,091.90 and perform 250 hours of community service.
Respondent's conviction is essentially similar to a violation of Penal Law § 155.40, grand larceny in the second degree, a class C felony (see also, Penal Law § 155.30). He therefore ceased to be an attorney upon his conviction (see, Judiciary Law § 90[4][a], [e] ).
We, therefore, grant petitioner's motion which respondent advises he does not oppose and strike respondent's name from the roll of attorneys pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90(4)(b).
ORDERED that petitioner's motion is granted; and it is further
ORDERED that respondent is disbarred and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law, effective immediately; and it is further
ORDERED that respondent is commanded to desist and refrain from the practice of law in any form either as principal or as agent, clerk or employee of another; he is forbidden to appear as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, judge, justice, board, commission or other public authority, or to give an opinion as to the law or its application, or any advice in relation thereto; and it is further
ORDERED that respondent shall comply with the provisions of this Court's rules (see, 22 NYCRR 806.9) regulating the conduct of disbarred attorneys.
PER CURIAM.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: April 19, 2001
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)