Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Michael H. WOODWARD, Appellant.
Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Columbia County (Czajka, J.), rendered July 13, 2005, which revoked defendant's probation and imposed a sentence of imprisonment.
In 1999, defendant pleaded guilty to criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree. He was sentenced to five years of probation and ordered to perform 500 hours of community service and pay $1,155 in fines and surcharges. He was subsequently charged on five separate occasions with violating the terms of his probation. Having admitted to certain violations, defendant was twice continued on probation with modified conditions pertaining to substance abuse treatment. Upon his most recent probation violation admissions, that he failed to timely complete his community service and had committed the crime of burglary in the third degree in Dutchess County, County Court revoked defendant's probation and resentenced him to 2 1/313 to 7 years in prison, to be served consecutively to his sentence arising out of his burglary conviction. Defendant now appeals, arguing that his resentence was harsh and excessive.
Given defendant's proven inability to abide by the reasonable terms of his probation despite multiple opportunities to do so, we find neither an abuse of discretion by County Court nor the existence of any extraordinary circumstances justifying a reduction of the resentence in the interest of justice (see People v. Walts, 34 A.D.3d 1043, 1044, 824 N.Y.S.2d 479 [2006], lv. denied 8 N.Y.3d 850, 830 N.Y.S.2d 709, 862 N.E.2d 801 [2007] ). Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: August 02, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)