Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Thomas RILEY, Petitioner, v. Glenn S. GOORD, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Chemung County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
As the result of an investigation, petitioner's wife was found to be in possession of a condom containing heroin which she secreted in her underwear during a visit to the correctional facility where petitioner was incarcerated. In connection with this incident, petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with conspiring to introduce narcotics and soliciting others to smuggle items into the correctional facility. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, he was found guilty of both charges. The determination was affirmed on administrative appeal, resulting in this CPLR article 78 proceeding.
We confirm. The misbehavior report, together with the testimony of the correction officers involved in the investigation and the confidential information viewed by the Hearing Officer in camera, provide substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt (see Matter of Bankston v. Selsky, 301 A.D.2d 984, 985, 754 N.Y.S.2d 442 [2003]; Matter of Ruiz v. Goord, 289 A.D.2d 810, 810, 735 N.Y.S.2d 434 [2001] ). Contrary to petitioner's claim, he was not improperly denied the right to call his wife and another female as witnesses at the hearing as both were incarcerated on criminal charges related to the incident in question and were the subjects of an ongoing investigation. Under the circumstances presented, having them testify would jeopardize correctional goals (see 7 NYCRR 254.5[a]; Matter of Hill v. Selsky, 19 A.D.3d 64, 66, 795 N.Y.S.2d 794 [2005] ). Petitioner's remaining claims have been considered and found to be without merit.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: October 20, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)