Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Ronald LEVY, Petitioner, v. Glenn S. GOORD, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination finding him guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules that prohibit disobeying a direct order and failing to comply with urinalysis procedures after he failed to provide a urine sample within three hours of being ordered to do so. Contrary to petitioner's contention, the misbehavior report, documentary evidence and testimony at the hearing provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see Matter of Infante v. Selsky, 21 A.D.3d 633, 799 N.Y.S.2d 331 [2005] ). Although petitioner asserts that he was not given the full three hours in which to provide a urine sample (see 7 NYCRR 1020.4[d][4] ), the conflicting testimony presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see Matter of Nimmons v. Goord, 7 A.D.3d 887, 888, 776 N.Y.S.2d 629 [2004]; Matter of Williams v. Ricks, 303 A.D.2d 860, 861, 755 N.Y.S.2d 343 [2003] ). Petitioner's remaining contentions, including his challenge to the videotape evidence and claim of hearing officer bias, have been reviewed and found to be without merit.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: October 20, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)