Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Joseph VAN HOUTEN, Petitioner, v. Alan G. HEVESI, as State Comptroller, et al., Respondents.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Comptroller which denied petitioner's application for accidental disability retirement benefits.
Petitioner worked as a motor equipment operator for approximately 27 years. On December 13, 2000, petitioner was injured when the road under the dump truck he was operating collapsed. His application for accidental disability retirement benefits was denied following a hearing on the basis that he was not permanently incapacitated from performing his duties (see Retirement and Social Security Law § 63). This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.
We confirm. The expert for respondent New York State and Local Employees' Retirement System testified that his examination of petitioner and his review of petitioner's MRI and EMG test results failed to discover objective medical evidence to support a conclusion that petitioner was permanently incapacitated from performing his duties as a motor equipment operator. Although petitioner's treating physician presented a contrary medical opinion, respondent Comptroller was free to credit the opinion of the Retirement System's expert over that of petitioner's physician (see Matter of Stern v. Hevesi, 12 A.D.3d 831, 832, 783 N.Y.S.2d 889 [2004]; Matter of Johnson v. Hevesi, 10 A.D.3d 835, 836, 782 N.Y.S.2d 141 [2004] ). Thus, as the determination is supported by substantial evidence in the record, it will not be disturbed (see Matter of Stern v. Hevesi, supra at 831-832, 783 N.Y.S.2d 889; Matter of De Carolis v. McCall, 272 A.D.2d 824, 824-825, 708 N.Y.S.2d 192 [2000] ).
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: July 07, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)