Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Jose C. VALDES, Petitioner, v. Donald SELSKY, as Director of Special Housing Unit, Department of Correctional Services, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Chemung County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.
After conducting a search of petitioner's cell, correction officers found a shank in a hollowed-out piece of wood attached to the wall. Following a tier III hearing, petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule prohibiting inmates from possessing weapons. In our view, the detailed misbehavior report and the testimony of the two correction officers stating that no one occupied petitioner's cell in his absence provide substantial evidence supporting the determination of petitioner's guilt (see, Matter of Vasquez v. Goord, 263 A.D.2d 819, 694 N.Y.S.2d 799; Matter of Caraway v. Walker, 247 A.D.2d 675, 668 N.Y.S.2d 505). Although petitioner denies that the weapon was his, an inference of possession arises inasmuch as it was found within a cell that petitioner had occupied for at least three consecutive weeks (see, Matter of Ebanks v. Goord, 263 A.D.2d 588, 693 N.Y.S.2d 675; Matter of Tarbell v. Goord, 263 A.D.2d 563, 693 N.Y.S.2d 262). Petitioner's remaining contentions have been reviewed and found to be without merit.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: February 24, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)