Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Shaul LINYEAR, Petitioner, v. Glenn S. GOORD, as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Correctional Services, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Greene County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.
Petitioner, a prison inmate, was found guilty of the charge of possession of a weapon as a result of a cube search in which a weapon was found inside a shirt located on petitioner's bed. While petitioner asserts that other inmates had access to the area where the weapon was found, this is insufficient to negate the inference of petitioner's possession given the misbehavior report and testimony presented at the hearing, including that of the correction officer who found the weapon on petitioner's bed. Under these circumstances, substantial evidence supports the determination of guilt (see, Matter of Morris v. Selsky, 264 A.D.2d 925, 694 N.Y.S.2d 821; Matter of Lee v. Goord, 244 A.D.2d 969, 665 N.Y.S.2d 159). Petitioner's contention that the weapon did not belong to him merely presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see, Matter of Morris v Selsky, supra; Matter of Hay v. Coombe, 229 A.D.2d 1015, 645 N.Y.S.2d 668, lv. denied 88 N.Y.2d 816, 651 N.Y.S.2d 406, 674 N.E.2d 336). The remaining contentions asserted by petitioner, including his claim of Hearing Officer bias, have been reviewed and are found to be unpersuasive.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: March 02, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)