Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Angeline FITZGERALD, plaintiff-respondent, v. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY, et al., appellants, Harrison Warner, defendant-respondent.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The accident at issue involved a collision between a bus owned by the New York City Transit Authority (hereinafter the NYCTA) and driven by the defendant John Gordon (hereinafter the NYCTA defendants), and a car driven by the codefendant Harrison Warner. The plaintiff was a passenger on the bus when the accident occurred. It is undisputed that at the time of the impact the bus was stopped partially in a bus stop, angled so that its rear section protruded into, and obstructed, a lane of moving traffic. Warner stated at his examination before trial that his car had been traveling about two car lengths behind the bus when the bus's brake lights went on, it signaled right, and it started to move into the right parking lane, where the bus stop was located. Warner stated that he applied his brakes to slow down when he saw the rear lights of the bus go on, and that he hit his brakes hard when he realized the bus had suddenly stopped without completing its lane change.
The fact that a codefendant might be negligent as a matter of law for rear ending a stopped vehicle does not mean that the operator of the stopped vehicle was necessarily free of negligence (see e.g. Lenahan v. Goucher, 65 N.Y.2d 1034, 494 N.Y.S.2d 293, 484 N.E.2d 656, rev'g on dissent of Yesawich, J., 111 A.D.2d 546, 548, 489 N.Y.S.2d 418; Heal v. Liszewski, 294 A.D.2d 911, 741 N.Y.S.2d 374; Purcell v. Axelsen, 286 A.D.2d 379, 729 N.Y.S.2d 495; Colonna v. Suarez, 278 A.D.2d 355, 718 N.Y.S.2d 618; People v. Brooks, 249 A.D.2d 572, 670 N.Y.S.2d 934, affd. 93 N.Y.2d 862, 689 N.Y.S.2d 13, 711 N.E.2d 198; Niemiec v. Jones, 237 A.D.2d 267, 654 N.Y.S.2d 163). Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court properly denied summary judgment to the NYCTA defendants because questions of fact were raised as to whether the bus was operated in a negligent manner and, if so, whether that negligence contributed to the accident.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: December 15, 2003
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)