Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Maria Mercedes AGUILAR, appellant, v. RECKSON ASSOCIATES REALTY CORP., defendant third-party plaintiff-respondent; L & L Gardens, Inc., third-party defendant-respondent, et al., third-party defendant.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kitzes, J.), dated August 24, 2004, which granted the separate motions of the defendant Reckson Associates Realty Corp. and the third-party defendant L & L Gardens, Inc., for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs.
The plaintiff slipped and fell on ice on the exterior stairs of a building managed by the defendant Reckson Associates Realty Corp. Pursuant to a written snow removal contract, the third-party defendant L & L Gardens, Inc., performed snow and ice removal services on the premises. The Supreme Court granted the respective motions of those parties for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. We affirm.
A party in control of real property may not be held liable for accidents occurring as a result of the accumulation of snow or ice on its premises until an adequate period of time has passed following the cessation of a storm to allow the party to remedy the hazardous condition (see Gor v. High View Estates Owners Corp., 17 A.D.3d 316, 793 N.Y.S.2d 98, lv. denied 5 N.Y.3d 709, 803 N.Y.S.2d 29, 836 N.E.2d 1152; Dowden v. Long Is. R.R., 305 A.D.2d 631, 759 N.Y.S.2d 544).
The defendant and L & L Gardens, Inc., established their prima facie entitlement to summary judgment with evidence of the plaintiff's own observations that there was ongoing precipitation at the time of the accident. In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Therefore, the Supreme Court properly granted the motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 28, 2006
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)